The Planning Process of Preliminary Task 1
Assignment: To create a sequence where a character opens a door, walks through a room (without crossing the line), and exchanges two sentences of dialogue with another character.
Must include: -180 degree rule
- Match on action
- Shot reverse shot
Our purpose of this film was to create an enticing, awkward job interview where the interviewee was a sloppy, careless teenage boy, and the interviewer was the manager of an upper class company. We constructed a STORY BOARD to illustrate how we would achieve this. However, we had to cross out the first 3 boxes as we didn't think they would be useful or effective in creating what we needed. By using mid close ups and close ups on the actors and their reactions to each other, we tried to get across to the audience the disprovals of the interviewer and the total disrespectfulness of the interviewee. For example, by using a close up on Jane's face after she was rudely interrupted by Daniel shows us her disapproval and disgust in his behavior.
We made a SCRIPT and went through each of the lines that we created for the actors to make sure that each action and each word they said would sound and look like something the actual people would do in a real life situation. We kept the majority of Daniel Parker's (played by Jesse Toderan) lines short and blunt, to get across his abrupt and sharp character, whereas Jane Smith's (played by India Ironside) lines were more structured and descriptive because she is well educated and in a professional occupation. The props we used were a glass of water; for Daniel's rude interruption, a hotdog; to empashize is sloppiness when he left the room, and glasses for Jane as part of her costume to make her appear classically "smarter" and professional. Jane's costume included our school's (City Impact Church School) blouse, vest, tie, and skirt; whereas Daniel wore his own personal hoodie, track pants, and cap, with white Vans impersonation shoes which I personally purchased from The Warehouse.
The SHOT LIST we created was used to keep us working towards time and to stick to schedule, showed how long approximately each shot should be, having the more significant shots be longer than the others; for example, when Miss Jane questions Daniel's motive for applying for the job, it is longer than his reply. This is to show that in her shot, she is talking about the investment and dedication that this job takes, where then she is rudely cut off but his silent reply of money. The shot also included what props we needed, such as the glass or the hotdog, in bold, to clearly show my partner Alexis and myself when they were needed.

BROOKE-
ReplyDeletePlanning:
Think about visual arrangement of your blog entries, right down to colour of text, uniform font, photo placement and viewability – basically, when you think you’ve finished, do this:
Close your eyes. Open them and pretend you’re trying to evaluate someone else’s work – how well set out is the content? Do LAYOUT and CONTENT both demonstrate a strong awareness of how meanings are created through purposeful use of media? (Right now, the layout and the content are giving conflicting signals)
When discussing revisions and changes you made, make sure to tell us WHY you made those choices. For example, “we didn’t think [the old shots] would be useful” – okay; why not? What made the new ones better? Think about your phrasing.
Think about symbolism of costume choice – what stereotypes are reinforced by your choices?
Other than layout, reasonably good work on the Shot List, though still a bit surface level.
OVERALL: 9/20
Presentation matters. Go for further depth in your answers.
- T. Marcus
BROOKE-
ReplyDeleteFinal cut of film sequence:
Please take note the following critiques, and have this sort of thing fixed for next time.
Sound edit – Between clips, the sound often fades, drops or raises drastically, even if it’s background “white noise” – and it’s noticeable! During your edit, play the final cut through from start to finish with your eyes closed. Just listen. Then apply transitions / edits as necessary.
Timing of shots – Some jumps felt early. Get the most out of your shots, and use every frame for a purpose!
Out of the box thinking and post-production decisions: Great thought on the building of tension through your zoom in on freeze-frame during non-diegetic sound overlay, then cutting back to intro music and hot dog shot for comic result. THIS is using technical elements to create varying effects.
OVERALL: 11/20 (pending export!)
* Ability to plan a media product is satisfactory, as seen by evidence in planning segment, though this presentation needs development. Decisions and revisions are evident, particularly in the editing process. The finished product clearly comes from this process and is readable as a film sequence, with a strongly apparent meaning for the viewer. Elements relating to film are satisfactory:
* 180-degree rule not broken, though only one over-the-shoulder shot and never really reversed over other character’s shoulder. “Shot-reverse-shot” most convincingly displayed by jump cuts to MCUs of character on opposite side of screen, or through alternating PoV shots. Still not quite the technical definition of the rule itself.
* Match on action shot at water to Jesse’s lips – well done with sound edit, though visual would’ve been stronger on an ECU shot of drinking.
* Continuity errors in India’s glasses – where are they during her CU shots?
* Dialogue fine.
* More thought needs to go into setting.
* Competent use of digital tools in CCR.
* Where is final export? If it’s not available for Cambridge to view, I can’t say it passed. Until it’s up on your blog, this is a 9/20.
- T. Marcus
BROOKE-
ReplyDeleteCCR:
OVERALL: 7/20
Rush job! Overall, this results in a sense of limited awareness regarding how the use of technical elements creates meaning in media products.
Where is link to final export?
Layout, again, needs more thought. What social groups and issues were being represented? HOW did you use or challenge the conventions of these representations? Quality of answer needs to consider the question carefully, and the answer should make sense to someone who isn’t in your brain. You got impatient. Walk us through it!
What do you mean, “we use different camera and sounds”? Did you use more than one camera? Explanations feel rushed at best. Some statements do not seem focused on the question (ie. “[we used] the 180 degree [rule] when filming this”).
Depth of answers to question #2 will increase with time, though I think you’re noticing the right topic areas to consider. You’ll flesh these out more in the next task.
Final question – “Integrating Technologies”; be specific! What do you mean “shots were missing”? You’ve worded it so it sounds like the files inexplicably vanished, but you never filmed them in the first place. This isn’t “missing files”. So what is it? What were you ultimately altering?
Don’t mention that you didn’t setup the lights; you DID direct their setup in terms of the effect you thought you were after. Talk about THAT.
- T. Marcus